![]() In these cases, you can try requesting the original file or consulting fact-checking websites to see whether they have already verified or debunked the footage in question. One hurdle to this approach is that social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter often strip the metadata from photos and videos when they are uploaded to their sites. Online metadata viewers also exist that allow you to check by using the image’s web link. To check metadata for yourself, you can download the file and use software such as Adobe Photoshop or Bridge to examine it. This Telegram post claims Polish-speaking saboteurs attacked a sewage facility in an attempt to place a tank of chlorine for a “ false flag” attack.īut the video’s metadata – the details about how and when the video was created – show it was filmed days before the alleged date of the incident. An article we wrote late last year for the Australian Associated Press explains the fact-checking process at each stage: image creation, editing and distribution. You can attempt to fact-check images for yourself rather than taking them at face value. What can the West do to help Ukraine? It can start by countering Putin's information strategy Platforms are also doing some work behind the scenes to detect and publicly share information on state-linked information operations. They have also tweaked their algorithms to change what content is amplified and have hired staff to spot and flag misleading content. Social media platforms have added new labels to identify state-run media organisations or provide more background information about sources or people in your networks who have also shared a particular story. Large, well-resourced news outlets such as the BBC are also calling out misinformation. Journalists and fact-checkers are also working to verify content and raise awareness of known fakes. What’s being done about it?Įuropean organisations such as Bellingcat have begun compiling lists of dubious social media claims about the Russia-Ukraine conflict and debunking them where necessary. This tweet could be seen as an attempt to downplay the extent of damage resulting from a Russian-backed missile attack, and in a wider context to create confusion and doubt as to veracity of other images emerging from the conflict zone. The satirical text accompanying the image jokes about the “calibre of the construction machinery” - the author suggesting that reports of damage to buildings from military ordinance are exaggerated or untrue.Ĭlose inspection reveals this image was digitally altered to include the machinery. An example of object addition is the below photograph, which purports to show construction machinery outside a kindergarten in eastern Ukraine. Taking things further still, Photoshop or equivalent software can be used to add or remove people or objects from a scene, or to crop elements out from a photograph. A tight shot of people, for example, can make it hard to gauge how many were in a crowd, compared with an aerial shot. ![]() Using a particular lens or vantage point can also change how the scene looks and can be used to deceive. This was the case with destroyed vehicles that Russia claimed were bombed by Ukraine. This requires no special software or technical skills – just a willingness to upload an old video of a missile attack or other arresting image, and describe it as new footage.Īnother low-tech option is to stage or pose actions or events and present them as reality. Using an existing photo or video and claiming it came from a different time or place is one of the most common forms of misinformation in this context. How is this fake content created and spread, what’s being done to debunk it, and how can you ensure you don’t fall for it yourself? What are the most common fakery techniques? Queensland University of Technology provides funding as a member of The Conversation AU. Paula Dootson has received funding from the Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC, Queensland Government, and Natural Hazards Research Australia. He is also a past contributor to the Australian Associated Press.ĭaniel Angus receives funding from Australian Research Council through Discovery Projects DP200100519 ‘Using machine vision to explore Instagram’s everyday promotional cultures’, DP200101317 ‘Evaluating the Challenge of ‘Fake News’ and Other Malinformation’, and Linkage Project LP190101051 'Young Australians and the Promotion of Alcohol on Social Media'. Thomson has received funding from the AAP, the Australian Academy of the Humanities, and from the Australian Research Council through Discovery Project DP210100859. Senior Lecturer, Queensland University of Technology Professor of Digital Communication, Queensland University of Technology Senior Lecturer in Visual Communication & Media, Queensland University of Technology
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |